![]() For now.īecause once you get a critical mass of people sharing information they *can* get to, the toppling of government censorship isn't far behind. And if the only way people can get internet access in some countries if if the entire country's access is filtered, so be it. I do object to government-imposed censorship – but at the same time, I'd rather people have censored internet access than none at all. If customers don't agree with your categorizations, they can buy a different net nanny. ![]() I don't think having an adult-baby fetish disqualifies you from categorizing websites the way you want to. ![]() I don't object to the existence of censorware for people who voluntarily install it. On the other hand, Kathryn Cramer has an interesting point about the specific BoingBoing picture that brought all of this to light, and she publishes the email exchange with Tomo to support her contention that "it was exposing the human breast in the context of nursing that was perceived as sexual and inappropriate." Although as Tomo says, he didn't flag it as sexual, he flagged it as nudity.įor me, Tomo and his possible fetish are a non-issue. This is my first awareness that "adult-baby" is an actual fetish, although it doesn't shock or surprise me.Īnd why should he cover his tracks? If he feels like his crusade is to produce software that lets customers switch access to various categories of web sites on and off, that seems separate to me from his own predilections as a fetishist. It's quite possible the guy is a responsible adult who makes censorship software because he knows what's out there in the sexual underground, including fetishes that many of us don't.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |